<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill&#039;s Notebook &#187; citizen engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/tag/citizen-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com</link>
	<description>Random notes on politics, government, science, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open Government &#8211; But Not Too Open</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/11/open-government-but-not-too-open/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/11/open-government-but-not-too-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informaton overload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though Will Thalheimer&#8217;s post is directed to learning professionals, his observation that unleashing too much information on the public can be overwhelming and confusing is a great warning for open government advocates.  So, when discussing opening up government data to the public, there also needs to be a complementary effort to help citizens understand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though <a href="http://www.willatworklearning.com/2010/03/the-information-explosion.html" target="_blank">Will Thalheimer&#8217;s post is directed to learning professionals</a>, his observation that unleashing too much information on the public can be overwhelming and confusing is a great warning for open government advocates.  So, when discussing opening up government data to the public, there also needs to be a complementary effort to help citizens understand and manage the massive data flow.  Maybe it should be Open-and-EngagedGov rather than just OpenGov.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/11/open-government-but-not-too-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA Has the Coolest Stuff! Interactive Citizen Engagement.</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/09/nasa-has-the-coolest-stuff-interactive-citizen-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/09/nasa-has-the-coolest-stuff-interactive-citizen-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great interactive demonstration of the Space Communication Network.  Good example of creative of citizen engagement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/3d_resources/spacecomm.html" target="_blank">Great interactive demonstration of the Space Communication Network</a>.  Good example of creative of citizen engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/09/nasa-has-the-coolest-stuff-interactive-citizen-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not all of the Digital Natives are that Digital</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/08/not-all-of-the-digital-natives-are-that-digital/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/08/not-all-of-the-digital-natives-are-that-digital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital natives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generation gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My other day job is teaching web development and political communication for the University of Louisville.  I&#8217;ve taught college classes for ten years now and to a wide range of ages.  That is why I am skeptical about the concept of the Digital Natives (students born between 1980 and 2000).  In my experience, age is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My other day job is teaching web development and political communication for the University of Louisville.  I&#8217;ve taught college classes for ten years now and to a wide range of ages.  That is why I am skeptical about the concept of the <em>Digital Natives</em> (students born between 1980 and 2000).  In my experience, age is not a good predictor of the technical expertise of students.  This is why I was glad to see a recent article in <em>The Economist</em> that validated my anecdotal experiences.</p>
<p>According to the &#8220;<a href="http://www.economist.com/science-technology/technology-quarterly/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15582279&amp;fsrc=rss" target="_blank">Net Generation, Unplugged</a>,&#8221; there is growing skepticism among academics that the digital natives are any better at technology than the other generations.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">&#8220;Michael Wesch, who pioneered the use of new media in his cultural  anthropology classes at Kansas State University, is also sceptical [sic],  saying that many of his incoming students have only a superficial  familiarity with the digital tools that they use regularly, especially  when it comes to the tools’ social and political potential. Only a small  fraction of students may count as true digital natives, in other words.  The rest are no better or worse at using technology than the rest of  the population.&#8221;</span></strong></p>
<p>This is important to the OpenGov community because preconceptions about how the generations approach technology can hinder efforts for openness and engagement.  These preconceptions can also affect how new government managers are treated as they enter the workforce.  As Jennifer Deal argues in her book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Retiring-Generation-Gap-Employees-Leadership/dp/0787985252/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top" target="_blank"><em>Retiring the Generation Gap: How Employees Young and Old Can Find Common Ground</em></a>, the generations all want the same things (family, recognition, achievement, etc.) but how they perceive each other is what causes the gaps.  Changing perceptions is the first step in better engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/03/08/not-all-of-the-digital-natives-are-that-digital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

