<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Speaking For All Mankind &#187; Ning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/tag/ning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com</link>
	<description>Random notes on politics, government, science, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Your Existing Tools Are Still Just As Good As The Latest, Greatest Tool</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/25/your-existing-tools-are-still-just-as-good-as-the-latest-greatest-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/25/your-existing-tools-are-still-just-as-good-as-the-latest-greatest-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Armano of Logic+Emotion writes: &#8220;Stop looking for the next Twitter. Why? It&#8217;s simple—because the odds are you already have plenty of projects and ideas with proven potential that you need to improve on without worrying about the next thing you&#8217;ll start.&#8220;  Armano then goes on to list the four major tools that still have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Armano of <em>Logic+Emotion</em> writes: &#8220;<a title="Stop Looking For the Next Twitter" href="http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2009/11/stop-twitter.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Logicemotion+%28Logic%2BEmotion%29&amp;utm_content=Bloglines" target="_blank">Stop looking for the next Twitter. Why? It&#8217;s simple—because the odds are you already have plenty of projects and ideas with proven potential that you need to improve on without worrying about the next thing you&#8217;ll start.</a>&#8220;  Armano then goes on to list the four major tools that still have significant value: websites, blogs, intranets, and social community applications (Facebook, Ning, etc.).  It&#8217;s good advice because each of the tools bring different capabilities and assets to the overall communication infrastructure of an organization.  Better to have a full toolkit to choose from than just one tool to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/25/your-existing-tools-are-still-just-as-good-as-the-latest-greatest-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
