<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Speaking For All Mankind &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com</link>
	<description>Random notes on politics, government, science, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Leave Out the Moon? Questioning President Obama&#8217;s Vision for the Space Program</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/04/16/why-leave-out-the-moon-questioning-president-obamas-vision-for-the-space-program/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/04/16/why-leave-out-the-moon-questioning-president-obamas-vision-for-the-space-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama laid out an ambitious vision for American space exploration that included missions to an asteroid and to Mars while opening up routine launches to low-Earth orbit by private industries.  It is a great vision and I especially like the mission to an asteroid because of the vast mineral wealth from Near-Earth Objects and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1004/15obama/" target="_blank">President Obama laid out an ambitious vision for American space exploration that included missions to an asteroid and to Mars while opening up routine launches to low-Earth orbit by private industries</a>.  It is a great vision and I especially like the mission to an asteroid because of the vast mineral wealth from Near-Earth Objects and to develop an ability to protect against asteroid impacting on Earth.  It also appears that the plan has <a href="http://spacefrontier.org/2010/04/16/foundation-urges-support-for-new-nasa-space-plan/" target="_blank">widespread support in the space community</a>.</p>
<p>I do disagree with leaving out a mission to the Moon.  The Moon is a great base for launching missions to the asteroids and to Mars.  We know we can reach it within a few days, it has <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/10/1019_051019_moon_oxygen.html" target="_blank">mineral resources</a>, <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/is-there-water-on-the-moon-bucketloads.html" target="_blank">water</a>, and an <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/space/1283056" target="_blank">energy source for fusion</a>.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBQHtF3WhMw" target="_blank">The Moon&#8217;s gravity well is much smaller than the Earth&#8217;s gravity well and thus it easier to build bigger craft and launch them with less fuel</a>.  Building a base on the Moon allows us to test out technologies and methods that can help us explore Mars.</p>
<p>This is not an argument for reestablishing the Constellation program.  Canceling Constellation was the right call as is the push to leave Low-Earth Orbit.  But skipping past such an obvious asset in our mission to Mars just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/04/16/why-leave-out-the-moon-questioning-president-obamas-vision-for-the-space-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Play Checkers, Republicans Play Chess, Obama Plays Go</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/25/democrats-play-checkers-republicans-play-chess-obama-plays-go/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/25/democrats-play-checkers-republicans-play-chess-obama-plays-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midterms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching the Olberman/Maddow wailing over Obama&#8217;s spending freeze proposal.  I am especially enjoying the Republican glee over their supposed victory on this front.  The Republicans do not see the trap that has been set for them in the midterms. From Go strategy &#8211; &#8220;Reduction: Placing a stone far enough into the opponent&#8217;s area of influence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the Olberman/Maddow wailing over Obama&#8217;s spending freeze proposal.  I am especially enjoying the Republican glee over their supposed victory on this front.  The Republicans do not see the trap that has been set for them in the midterms.</p>
<p>From Go strategy &#8211; &#8220;Reduction: Placing a stone far enough into the opponent&#8217;s area of influence to reduce the amount of territory he/she will eventually get, but not so far in that it can be cut off from friendly stones outside.&#8221;</p>
<p>The midterms will be a major setback for the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/25/democrats-play-checkers-republicans-play-chess-obama-plays-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
