<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Speaking For All Mankind &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com</link>
	<description>Random notes on politics, government, science, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Social Media Isn&#8217;t a Fad</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/26/why-social-media-isnt-a-fad/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/26/why-social-media-isnt-a-fad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing video!  Now, speaking as a public administration and public policy scholar, I am fascinated to see how this will change government in the next decade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Social Media Revolution" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIFYPQjYhv8&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank">Amazing video</a>!  Now, speaking as a public administration and public policy scholar, I am fascinated to see how this will change government in the next decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/26/why-social-media-isnt-a-fad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>33% of US Post Status Messages at Least Once a Week</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/19/33-of-us-post-status-messages-at-least-once-a-week/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/19/33-of-us-post-status-messages-at-least-once-a-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Forrester Research (thanks for the link from Read Write Web).  If you are responsible for government agency communications, you will want to look at Figure 1.  How is your agency&#8217;s social media strategy serving the various groups on that ladder?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Forrester Research (thanks for the link from <a title="Forrester Research Study of Online Activity" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/one_third_of_us_internet_users_now_posts_status_up.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+%28ReadWriteWeb%29&amp;utm_content=Bloglines" target="_blank">Read Write Web</a>).  If you are responsible for government agency communications, you will want to look at Figure 1.  How is your agency&#8217;s social media strategy serving the various groups on that ladder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/19/33-of-us-post-status-messages-at-least-once-a-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Communication First?</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/18/a-communication-first/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/18/a-communication-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was talking to a friend about my January 14th posting where I wrote about being &#8220;unfollowed&#8221; on Twitter after an exchange over the validity of informal learning.  He laughed about it and told me that I shouldn&#8217;t be so sensitive.  &#8220;It happens all the time.&#8221; he said. &#8220;Well, then social networking has achieved a communication [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking to a friend about my <a title="Challenging Informal Learning" href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/14/the-price-for-challenging-informal-learning/" target="_blank">January 14th posting</a> where I wrote about being &#8220;unfollowed&#8221; on Twitter after an exchange over the validity of informal learning.  He laughed about it and told me that I shouldn&#8217;t be so sensitive.  &#8220;It happens all the time.&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, then social networking has achieved a communication first,&#8221; I replied.  &#8220;Remember the constant quote from our professors in the communication program?  That you cannot not communicate.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, it appears that social networking technologies can create new and more immediate ways of communicating.  And it also appears that social networking technologies can now make it possible to fully not communicate.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is a powerful unintended effect with major societal ramifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/18/a-communication-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Government by O&#8217;Reilly</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/23/open-government-by-oreilly/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/23/open-government-by-oreilly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is from the O&#8217;Reilly who is the technology publisher.  In the last year or so, he has written extensively on the use of Web 2.0 for opening up government and improving the connection between government and the citizens it serves.  In January 2010, he plans to publish Open Government which will be a collection [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the O&#8217;Reilly who is the technology publisher.  In the last year or so, he has written extensively on the use of Web 2.0 for opening up government and improving the connection between government and the citizens it serves.  In January 2010, he plans to publish <a title="Open Government" href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596804367" target="_blank"><em>Open Government</em></a> which will be a collection of essays, interviews, and case studies.  Should be a must read when it is published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/23/open-government-by-oreilly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designer Reality</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/04/designer-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/04/designer-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groupthink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back when the Internet was still an exclusive hobbyist network and Bill Clinton was running his first Presidential campaign, Walter Anderson was writing about how the technologies of that time allowed people to construct their own views of reality.  Back in the days of one cable news network, few people owned a cellphone, and 1200-baud [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when the Internet was still an exclusive hobbyist network and Bill Clinton was running his first Presidential campaign, Walter Anderson was w<a title="Reality Isn't What It Used To Be" href="http://www.amazon.com/Reality-Isnt-What-Ready-Wear/dp/0062500171/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1257388890&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">riting about how the technologies of that time allowed people to construct their own views of reality</a>.  Back in the days of one cable news network, few people owned a cellphone, and 1200-baud modems, his ideas seemed fantastic to me but I could see it happening once the necessary technology infrastructure was in place.</p>
<p>Now we have the Internet and it is quite easy to construct your own reality.  It&#8217;s called group polarization and, according to Joshua-Michéle Ross, it is one of the <a title="Three Paradoxes of the Internet Age" href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/11/three-paradoxes-of-the-internet-age.html" target="_blank">paradoxes of the Internet age</a>.  As the Internet offers us more opportunities to connect with more people, we tend to connect with people like us.  This leads to the hardening of opinions and a quicker propensity to group think.</p>
<p>This is why I worry about the dark side of social networking as informal learning gurus and collaboration vendors try to push their technological solutions.  I have yet to see a social networking technology that can counter groupthink or group polarization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/04/designer-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
