<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill&#039;s Notebook &#187; space program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/tag/space-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com</link>
	<description>Random notes on politics, government, science, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Plasma Rocket Breakthrough</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/06/01/plasma-rocket-breakthrough/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/06/01/plasma-rocket-breakthrough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asteroid mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma rocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plasma rocket technology is a game-changer in space exploration.  With plasma rockets, we could travel to Mars in 39 days rather than the estimated 18 months by chemical rockets.  Plasma rocket technology will also make commercial mining of asteroids a real possibility.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plasma rocket technology is a <a href="http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1006/01vasimr/" target="_blank">game-changer in space exploration</a>.  With plasma rockets, we could travel to Mars in 39 days rather than the estimated 18 months by chemical rockets.  Plasma rocket technology will also make commercial mining of asteroids a real possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/06/01/plasma-rocket-breakthrough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is 2010 the Dawn of the New Space Age?</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/14/is-2010-the-dawn-of-the-new-space-age/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/14/is-2010-the-dawn-of-the-new-space-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 22:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Dawn of the commercial space age.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/commentary/wb/242857" target="_blank">Dawn of the commercial space age</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/14/is-2010-the-dawn-of-the-new-space-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why private spacecraft will be successful for NASA</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/13/why-private-spacecraft-will-be-successful-for-nasa/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/13/why-private-spacecraft-will-be-successful-for-nasa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the author points out, private spacecraft don&#8217;t have to meet the requirements for a deep space mission.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36678222/ns/technology_and_science-space//" target="_blank">As the author points out, private spacecraft don&#8217;t have to meet the requirements for a deep space mission</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/13/why-private-spacecraft-will-be-successful-for-nasa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New jobs from commercializing space</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/12/new-jobs-from-commercializing-space/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/12/new-jobs-from-commercializing-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 22:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;11,800 Direct Jobs to Result From NASA’s $6.1 Billion Commercial Spaceflight Investment, Independent Analysis Shows.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.commercialspaceflight.org/?p=1186" target="_blank">&#8220;11,800 Direct Jobs to Result  From NASA’s $6.1 Billion Commercial Spaceflight Investment, Independent  Analysis Shows.&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/12/new-jobs-from-commercializing-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to clean up lower-Earth orbit</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/11/how-to-clean-up-lower-earth-orbit/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/11/how-to-clean-up-lower-earth-orbit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a big hurdle to further space commercialization has been cleared &#8211; Laser &#8220;tractor beams&#8221; to tidy up space junk.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a big hurdle to further space commercialization has been cleared &#8211; <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627585.900-laser-tractor-beams-to-tidy-up-space-junk.html" target="_blank">Laser &#8220;tractor beams&#8221; to tidy up space junk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/11/how-to-clean-up-lower-earth-orbit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama pushes for new space movement</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/10/obama-pushes-for-new-space-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/10/obama-pushes-for-new-space-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish the dates were moved up &#8211; Obama Vows Renewed Space Program.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the dates were moved up &#8211; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/science/space/16nasa.html?ref=science" target="_blank">Obama Vows Renewed Space Program.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/05/10/obama-pushes-for-new-space-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Leave Out the Moon? Questioning President Obama&#8217;s Vision for the Space Program</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/04/16/why-leave-out-the-moon-questioning-president-obamas-vision-for-the-space-program/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/04/16/why-leave-out-the-moon-questioning-president-obamas-vision-for-the-space-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama laid out an ambitious vision for American space exploration that included missions to an asteroid and to Mars while opening up routine launches to low-Earth orbit by private industries.  It is a great vision and I especially like the mission to an asteroid because of the vast mineral wealth from Near-Earth Objects and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1004/15obama/" target="_blank">President Obama laid out an ambitious vision for American space exploration that included missions to an asteroid and to Mars while opening up routine launches to low-Earth orbit by private industries</a>.  It is a great vision and I especially like the mission to an asteroid because of the vast mineral wealth from Near-Earth Objects and to develop an ability to protect against asteroid impacting on Earth.  It also appears that the plan has <a href="http://spacefrontier.org/2010/04/16/foundation-urges-support-for-new-nasa-space-plan/" target="_blank">widespread support in the space community</a>.</p>
<p>I do disagree with leaving out a mission to the Moon.  The Moon is a great base for launching missions to the asteroids and to Mars.  We know we can reach it within a few days, it has <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/10/1019_051019_moon_oxygen.html" target="_blank">mineral resources</a>, <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/is-there-water-on-the-moon-bucketloads.html" target="_blank">water</a>, and an <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/space/1283056" target="_blank">energy source for fusion</a>.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBQHtF3WhMw" target="_blank">The Moon&#8217;s gravity well is much smaller than the Earth&#8217;s gravity well and thus it easier to build bigger craft and launch them with less fuel</a>.  Building a base on the Moon allows us to test out technologies and methods that can help us explore Mars.</p>
<p>This is not an argument for reestablishing the Constellation program.  Canceling Constellation was the right call as is the push to leave Low-Earth Orbit.  But skipping past such an obvious asset in our mission to Mars just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/04/16/why-leave-out-the-moon-questioning-president-obamas-vision-for-the-space-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

