<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill&#039;s Notebook &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.billbrantley.com/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com</link>
	<description>Random notes on politics, government, science, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>33% of US Post Status Messages at Least Once a Week</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/19/33-of-us-post-status-messages-at-least-once-a-week/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/19/33-of-us-post-status-messages-at-least-once-a-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Forrester Research (thanks for the link from Read Write Web).  If you are responsible for government agency communications, you will want to look at Figure 1.  How is your agency&#8217;s social media strategy serving the various groups on that ladder?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Forrester Research (thanks for the link from <a title="Forrester Research Study of Online Activity" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/one_third_of_us_internet_users_now_posts_status_up.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+%28ReadWriteWeb%29&amp;utm_content=Bloglines" target="_blank">Read Write Web</a>).  If you are responsible for government agency communications, you will want to look at Figure 1.  How is your agency&#8217;s social media strategy serving the various groups on that ladder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2010/01/19/33-of-us-post-status-messages-at-least-once-a-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Existing Tools Are Still Just As Good As The Latest, Greatest Tool</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/25/your-existing-tools-are-still-just-as-good-as-the-latest-greatest-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/25/your-existing-tools-are-still-just-as-good-as-the-latest-greatest-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Armano of Logic+Emotion writes: &#8220;Stop looking for the next Twitter. Why? It&#8217;s simple—because the odds are you already have plenty of projects and ideas with proven potential that you need to improve on without worrying about the next thing you&#8217;ll start.&#8220;  Armano then goes on to list the four major tools that still have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Armano of <em>Logic+Emotion</em> writes: &#8220;<a title="Stop Looking For the Next Twitter" href="http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2009/11/stop-twitter.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Logicemotion+%28Logic%2BEmotion%29&amp;utm_content=Bloglines" target="_blank">Stop looking for the next Twitter. Why? It&#8217;s simple—because the odds are you already have plenty of projects and ideas with proven potential that you need to improve on without worrying about the next thing you&#8217;ll start.</a>&#8220;  Armano then goes on to list the four major tools that still have significant value: websites, blogs, intranets, and social community applications (Facebook, Ning, etc.).  It&#8217;s good advice because each of the tools bring different capabilities and assets to the overall communication infrastructure of an organization.  Better to have a full toolkit to choose from than just one tool to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/25/your-existing-tools-are-still-just-as-good-as-the-latest-greatest-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Social Software Should I Use For ELearning?</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/20/what-social-software-should-i-use-for-elearning/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/20/what-social-software-should-i-use-for-elearning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[elearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are seemingly numerous applications for elearning and trying to craft an elearning system can be confusing.  Learning Conversations has a great guide for determining what applications to use.  I especially like the fact that the guide is aimed toward the learner and not driven by the technology. But, I believe it only looks like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are seemingly numerous applications for elearning and trying to craft an elearning system can be confusing.  Learning Conversations has a <a title="Getting started with social software for learning" href="http://www.learningconversations.co.uk/main/index.php/2009/11/19/getting-started-with-social-software-for-learning?blog=5" target="_blank">great guide for determining what applications to use</a>.  I especially like the fact that the guide is aimed toward the learner and not driven by the technology.</p>
<p>But, I believe it only looks like a large number of applications.  Many of the applications are just variations of wikis, blogs, twitter, and FaceBook-type applications.  Where are the truly new applications that enhance the learning experience?  By focusing on the needs of the learners, I am sure that the new applications will arrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/20/what-social-software-should-i-use-for-elearning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Never Got Twitter</title>
		<link>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/12/i-never-got-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/12/i-never-got-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.billbrantley.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand Twitter technically but I was never sold on what was so revolutionary about it.  Calling it microblogging when it was really just a pale reflection of blogging never really seemed to explain it.  I&#8217;ve used it for events but every since I put the Facebook app on my phone, I use that instead. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Twitter technically but I was never sold on what was so revolutionary about it.  Calling it microblogging when it was really just a pale reflection of blogging never really seemed to explain it.  I&#8217;ve used it for events but every since I put the Facebook app on my phone, I use that instead.</p>
<p>Apparently, others are questioning Twitter&#8217;s utility because its <a title="Twitter traffic down" href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/12/twitter-flatline/" target="_blank">traffic has stalled for the last four months and is declining</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.billbrantley.com/2009/11/12/i-never-got-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

